![]() Parker remains best known for her role as Carrie Bradshaw, the twinkly sex columnist in the HBO series “Sex and the City,” who had a lustier relationship with Manolo Blahniks than with most of the men she dated. “Wear these in good health!” she said, doing the slightest curtsy. She packed the Cosettes into a box and handed them to the women. Her highlighted blond hair was pulled back into a tight chignon. She had on the same design along with her everyday “uniform,” a studiously distinctive take on jeans and a T-shirt: 7 for All Mankind denim, a cotton top that she cuts at the neckline and ruches with safety pins, and a charm necklace twisted through the strap of her bra so that the chain falls at her left breast, like an eccentrically long lapel pin. Parker was eagerly explaining how to store them between wears. The young woman had selected a pair of white lace Cosettes ($450), a heeled Mary Jane with a rhinestone buckle. “Stuff the toes with this,” she said, holding a wad of tissue paper up to a bride-to-be who was wedding-shoe shopping with her mother. Which actually makes James Bond’s future, with or without Craig, all the more exciting.On a recent Thursday afternoon at SJP Collection, a tiny, pink, candle-scented shoe boutique in Manhattan’s West Village, the store’s owner, the fifty-eight-year-old actress Sarah Jessica Parker, was working the floor. Despite this solid ground, it’s hard to see where the character can go from here. Having rebooted the character with Casino Royale, taken the obligatory miss-step with Quantum Of Solace, and now with both Skyfall and Spectre merged the franchise’s illustrious history with a stark, complicated modern tone that’s first aim is still to entertain, Craig has helped to solidify James Bond’s importance in the current movie climate. It’s no fault of the actors, more that the characters have either been underwritten or savaged in the editing suite.Īs a whole, though, Spectre is, if Daniel Craig decides to, the perfect swansong to his James Bond tenure. We’re expected to be impressed and afraid, but not enough is provided to back up the supposed menace. Waltz is especially terrific when he is paired opposite Daniel Craig. Plus, while its villainous duo of Dave Bautista and Christoph Waltz, both of whom reek of old-school Bond villains as a brutal henchman and calculated megalomaniac, respectively, flourish on-screen, they’re just not present enough to really make an impact. Its wit is satisfactory (rather than reaching hilarity), and at times it’s a little bit too easy for this Bond to get out of tight situations. ![]() Its plot, meanwhile, is preposterously thin - to the point where I genuinely forgot how Daniel Craig knew where to go at times. A lot of its dialogue waffles on for a bit too long as there is always just one line too many during exchanges. ![]() Not everything is right with Spectre, though. Meanwhile, Andrew Scott, Monica Bellucci and Jesper Christensen all chime in with cap-doffing performances, too. Madeleine Swann, and Ben Whishaw as Q, Ralph Fiennes as M, Naomie Harris as Moneypenny, and Rory Kinnear’s Bill Tanner proving to be worthy members of Bond’s posse. The full ensemble band together perfectly, with Lea Seydoux shining as Dr. It’s almost as if John Wayne and Don Draper have merged together, put on a suave suit, and decided to save the world. ![]() He does all this while still teasing an emotional depth and fatigue that makes his incarnation glisten with a relatability that sets him apart from previous versions. Is he getting the former to preserve his ego? Or saving the latter, because it’s the right thing to do? It’s murky, which makes Spectre that extra bit intriguing. ![]() Craig is unrelenting as James Bond, dismissing his superiors and taking advantage of his peers, as well as anyone else that can assist him, to make sure that he can get to his man and save the world. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |